Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 998 F.2d 638 - Camarillo v. McCarthy

Camarillo v. McCarthy’s Empirical Analysis

998 F.2d 638 · 1993

Citation profile

115
cited by 115 later decisions
3
states following
November 2020
most recently cited

51 federal appellate · 12 district · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 115 later decisions — most recently November 2020 · most notably Grossman v. City of Portland (1994), Sorrels v. McKee (2002)

51 federal appellate · 12 district · 3 state decisions

5701993200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Harlow v. Fitzgerald · Anderson v. Creighton · Mitchell v. Forsyth · Turner v. Safley · Gomez v. Toledo

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 115 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Qualified immunity protects government officials performing discretionary functions from liability for civil damages, unless the official's conduct violates clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable person would have known.”
    10 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “'the contours of the right [are] sufficiently clear that a reasonable official would understand that what he is doing violates that right.'”
    9 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “In the absence of a showing of prejudice, however, an affirmative defense may be raised for the first time at summary judgment.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.