Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 998 F.2d 751 - United States v. Simoy

United States v. Simoy’s Empirical Analysis

998 F.2d 751 · 1993

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
1
states following
September 2014
most recently cited

10 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1111 · 18 U.S.C. § 2111

Relies on Simmons v. United States · Neil v. Biggers · Manson v. Brathwaite · Keeble v. United States · Lorain Journal Co. Et Al. v. Milkovich

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “whether the witness's in-court identification was nonetheless reliable.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Counterbalancing [the witness's] poor viewing opportunity, however, is [the witness's] highly accurate description of appellant prior to the suggestive procedure.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “determine whether the procedure was so impermissibly suggestive as to give rise to a substantial likelihood of irreparable misidentification,”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.