Perez v. Simmons’s Empirical Analysis
998 F.2d 775 · 1993
Citation profile
8 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently February 2016
8 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Payton v. New York · Steagald v. United States · Perez v. Simmons · Perez v. Simmons
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Unless a jury finds that Albert was an actual co-resident of the apartment, and that the police had reasonable grounds for believing that Albert was in the apartment at the time, the search was in violation of Irma Perez’s constitutional rights.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Valdez v. McPheters“if the officers did not have reasonable grounds for believing that Albert resided in the apartment, the search was illegal under Steagald.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Valdez v. McPheters
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.