Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 998 F.2d 835 - United States v. McAfee

United States v. McAfee’s Empirical Analysis

998 F.2d 835 · 1993

Citation profile

28
cited by 28 later decisions
January 2016
most recently cited

14 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently January 2016 · most notably United States v. Disney (2001), United States v. Clark (1994)

14 federal appellate ·

160199320002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3583 · 18 U.S.C. § 922 (Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 1291

Relies on United States v. Blackston · United States v. Rockwell · United States v. Gordon

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “3 18 U.S.C. 3583(g) (emphasis added). This court has held that the existence of a controlled substance in a person's body constitutes”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[i]f the defendant is found by the court to be in the possession of a controlled substance, the court shall terminate the term of supervised release and require the defendant to serve in prison not less than one-third of the term of supervised release.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[i]f the defendant is found by the court to be in the possession of a controlled substance, the court shall terminate the term of supervised release....”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.