Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 998 F.2d 858 - Anderson v. Eby

Anderson v. Eby’s Empirical Analysis

998 F.2d 858 · 1993

Citation profile

30
cited by 30 later decisions
August 2024
most recently cited

11 federal appellate · 8 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently August 2024 · most notably Allison v. K, Eddie Stewart v. Adolph Coors Company a Colorado Corporation and Coors Brewing Company a Colorado Corporations (2000)

11 federal appellate · 8 district ·

1401993200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Mottley · Clearfield Trust Co. v. United States · Miree v. County Georgia Phillips · Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. Public Utilities Commission · Jones v. Dressel

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The permittee shall be solely liable for any and all accidents, injuries, and other costs incurred as a result of exercising the privileges under this permit____ The permit-tee is responsible for the health and safety of clients he guides on the National Forest.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “that federal law does not automatically control claims by third-party beneficiaries of federal contracts. Rather, we have held ... that when the federal government has an articulable interest in the outcome óf a dispute, federal law governs. Thus, if diverse resolutions of a controversy would frustrate the operations of a federal program, conflict with a specific national policy, or have some direct effect on the United States or its treasury, then federal law applies.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “from all liability ... for any and all loss, personal injury or damage ... whether caused by the negligence of [the defendants] or otherwise while [Anderson] is participating in the rental of snowmobiles or other equipment and participating in a snow tour or other activity of [defendants]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.