Lewis v. Babbitt’s Empirical Analysis
998 F.2d 880 · 1993
Citation profile
18 federal appellate · 7 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently December 2020 · most notably Custer County Action Ass'n v. Garvey (2001), Iskcon of Potomac, Inc. v. Kennedy (1995)
18 federal appellate · 7 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 16 U.S.C. § 20 · 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 5 U.S.C. § 706
Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. Volpe · Camp v. Pitts · Union Bank v. Wolas · Osgood v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Judicial review under these standards is generally based on the administrative record that was before the agency at the time of its decision ....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, or otherwise not in accordance with law.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“is plainly erroneous or inconsistent with the regulation,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.