Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 998 F.2d 997 - Rice v. Department of the Treasury

Rice v. Department of the Treasury’s Empirical Analysis

998 F.2d 997 · 1993

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
July 2019
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently July 2019

3 federal appellate · 1 district ·

100199320002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Ssih Equipment Sa v. United States International Trade Commission · Sanders v. United States Postal Service · Thomas v. General Services Administration · Kroeger v. United States Postal Service

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he law is well settled that the pendency of an appeal has no effect on the finality or binding effect of a trial court's holding.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.