State v. McCarty’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
60 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 60 later decisions — most recently August 2021 · most notably State v. Goodman (2004), State v. Recuenco (2008)
60 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Hagner v. United States · 117 Wash. 2d 93 - State v. Kjorsvik · State v. Brown · 125 Wash. 2d 782 - State v. Vangerpen · 107 Wash. 2d 346 - State v. Knapstad
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 60 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[s]urely to ensure due process, the notice of the charge on which a defendant will be tried most logically be given at some point prior to the opening statement of the trial!”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“[A] document charging conspiracy to deliver a controlled substance must allege that persons involved outside the act of delivery took part in the conspiracy agreement.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“[a]n accused has a constitutionally protected right to be informed of the criminal charge against him, so he will be able to prepare and mount a defense at trial.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Merritt · In Re Cruze
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.