State v. Jones’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 122 Wash. 2d 109 - State v. Halstien · 120 Wash. 2d 585 - State v. Greenwood · 87 Wash. 2d 870 - State v. Striker · 107 Wash. 2d 388 - Willener v. Sweeting · 115 Wash. 2d 364 - Fisher Properties, Inc. v. Arden-Mayfair, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“For purposes of CrR 3.3, an out-of-state defendant who is not in custody is not amenable to process in the usual sense of the term.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Treat“If a person is not amenable to process, the State is not required to show due diligence in bringing the person before the court.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Treat“If such a delay occurs, then the 90 day trial period is `deemed' to commence 14 days after the information is filed.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Treat
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.