998 So. 2d 1011 - Walton v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
February 2014
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Arizona v. Fulminante · 454 So. 2d 468 - Stringer v. State · 430 So. 2d 832 - Read v. State · United States v. Whitaker
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Man I did him [Anderson]. I had to do him.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“An appellate court will only address an issue of ineffective assistance of counsel on direct appeal if the parties stipulate counsel was ineffective, or the record is clear that counsel's performance was so deficient as to raise constitutional issues.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“However, the issue is not simply prejudice. It is, whether in light of the record as a whole, Walton would have been convicted beyond a reasonable doubt even without the tainted statement.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.