Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 998 SW2D 460 - Commonwealth v. Pelfrey

Commonwealth v. Pelfrey’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
January 2012
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Kansas Gas & Electric Co. v. Brock, Secretary of Labor, Et Al. · Sireci v. Florida · Gall v. Commonwealth · Dorton v. Commonwealth

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “that it is not required to recommend that all sentences be run all concurrently or all consecutively, but that it may recommend that some sentences be run concurrently and others consecutively.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.