Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 998 S.W.2d 61 - State v. Starr

State v. Starr’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
2
states following
April 2019
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on North Carolina v. Pearce · United States v. Goodwin · Alabama v. Smith · Colten v. Commonwealth of Kentucky · Chaffin v. Stynchcombe

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “when a second, different judge imposes a harsher sentence, we do not see the necessity in applying a prophylactic rule because there is little reason for the second judge to be vindictive since he or she did not preside at the first trial”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.