In Re Ct’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 2000A (Civil Rights Act of 1964)
Relies on Grand Jury Subpoenas Dated December Does Through IV v. United States · McGranahan v. Dahar · Boody v. Watson · In Re Investigating Grand Jury · State v. Nelson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Before establishing essential need for the information contained in the privileged records, however, the party seeking to pierce the privilege must first `establish a reasonable probability that the records contain information that is material and relevant to' the party's defense or claim.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In Re State“To establish essential need, the party seeking the privileged records must prove both that the targeted information is unavailable from another source and that there is a compelling justification for its disclosure.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In Re State“the privileges in question are not absolute and must yield when disclosure of the information concerned is considered essential.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In Re State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.