Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. General Dynamics Corp.’s Empirical Analysis
999 F.2d 113 · 1993
Citation profile
11 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently June 2023 · most notably Mooney v. Aramco Services Co. (1995), Federal Deposit Insurance v. Conner (1994)
11 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Alyeska Pipeline Service Company v. Wilderness Society · Bibby v. United States · Mahan & Rowsey, Inc. v. Oklahoma Natural Gas · Watson v. Fort Worth Bank & Trust · Bourjaily v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) the importance of the excluded testimony, (2) the explanation of the party for its failure to comply with the court’s order, (3) the potential prejudice that would arise from allowing the testimony, and (4) the availability of a continuance to cure such prejudice.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“sanctions should not be used lightly, and should be used as a lethal weapon only under extreme circumstances.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“In addition to Charging Party, the Commission also seeks relief for other similarly situated persons in the protected age group who were not hired. The Letter of Determination found that there was reasonable cause to believe that General Dynamics violated the Age Discrimination in Employment Act as to Charging Party and other similarly situated individuals. These individuals are entitled to back pay, benefits and an offer of a position. We are requesting a conference with you and the Respondent’s officials to discuss the identity and the relief for these individuals and to give you the opportunity to provide additional information.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.