Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 999 F.2d 1232 - Onstad v. Shalala

Onstad v. Shalala’s Empirical Analysis

999 F.2d 1232 · 1993

Citation profile

25
cited by 25 later decisions
April 2022
most recently cited

9 federal appellate · 4 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently April 2022 · most notably Shannon v. Chater (1995), Lacroix v. Barnhart (2006)

9 federal appellate · 4 district ·

1301993200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Bradley v. Bowen · Driggins v. Harris · Phelan v. Bowen

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[I]t is of some relevance to us that the [plaintiff's] lawyer did not obtain (or, so far as we know, try to obtain) the items that are now being complained about.”); Owens v. Astrue, 2008 WL 276299 at (E.D.Ark., January 30, 2008) (supplementing the Record”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.