Wright v. Dallman’s Empirical Analysis
999 F.2d 174 · 1993
Citation profile
72 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 84 later decisions — most recently January 2010 · most notably Clemmons v. Sowders (1994), Bugh v. Mitchell (2003)
72 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Kotteakos v. United States · Delaware v. Van Arsdall · Brecht v. Abrahamson · Estelle v. McGuire · Rose v. Clark
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 84 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“courts ‘have defined the category of infractions that violate ‘fundamental fairness’ very narrowly.’ ”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Bugh v. Mitchell“[we] review any findings of fact made by the district court only for clear error.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Greene v. Brigano
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.