Carlson v. Shalala’s Empirical Analysis
999 F.2d 180 · 1993
Citation profile
9 federal appellate · 3 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 60 later decisions — most recently March 2017 · most notably Herron v. Shalala (1994), Diaz v. Chater (1995)
9 federal appellate · 3 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Stephens v. Heckler · Young v. Secretary of Health & Human Services · Zblewski v. Schweiker · Halvorsen v. Heckler
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 60 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“assure us that the ALJ considered the important evidence ... [and to enable] us to trace the path of the ALJ's reasoning.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[w]e have repeatedly stated that the ALJ need not evaluate in writing every piece of testimony and evidence submitted.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[i]f the ALJ were to ignore an entire line of evidence, that would fall below the minimal level of articulation required,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Books v. Chater
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.