Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 999 F.2d 326 - Concordia College Corp. v. W.R. Grace & Co.

Concordia College Corp. v. W.R. Grace & Co.’s Empirical Analysis

999 F.2d 326 · 1993

Citation profile

62
cited by 62 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
December 2012
most recently cited

25 federal appellate · 4 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 62 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently December 2012 · most notably Pacific Insurance Company v. American National Fire Insurance Company, Rail Link, Incorporated (1998), National Bank of Commerce v. Dow Chemical Co. (1999)

25 federal appellate · 4 district · 2 state decisions

400199320002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Eisen v. Carlisle & Jacquelin · Salve Regina College v. Russell · American Pipe & Construction Co. v. Utah · Robertson v. Methow Valley Citizens Council · Crown, Cork & Seal Co. v. Parker

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 62 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[This Rule is] not designed to furnish a vehicle by which a disappointed party may reargue matters already argued and disposed of, nor [is it] aimed at providing a mechanism by which new arguments or legal theories, which could and should have been raised prior to the issuance of judgment, can be later advanced.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “... nor should a motion for reconsideration serve as the occasion to tender new legal theories for the first time.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “There is some question whether a putative class member can enjoy the benefits of tolling merely by opting out, even though the class action is still pending. The Supreme Court, in dicta has intimated as much, even though that is not the language of American Pipe or Crown, Cork & Seal.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.