United States v. Lowe’s Empirical Analysis
999 F.2d 448 · 1993
Citation profile
15 federal appellate · 4 district · 2 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 26 U.S.C. § 5861 (§ 201 of the Gun Control Act of 1968)
Relies on Wong Sun v. United States · Schneckloth v. Bustamonte · Coolidge v. New Hampshire · Brown v. Illinois · United States v. Matlock
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“was more a demand than a question. 19 To find consent, the district court must find from the totality of the circumstances that (1) the consent was voluntary, and (2) the search did not exceed the scope of the consent. United States v. Price, 925 F.2d 1268 , 1270 (10th Cir.1991).”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“By clear and positive testimony, the court must find that the consent was 'unequivocal and specific' and 'freely and intelligently' given, and the government must prove that consent was given without duress or coercion.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“because the proceedings below resulted in a record of amply sufficient detail and depth from which the determination may be made.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.