Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 999 F.2d 753 - Flanagan III Valverde III Savich III

Flanagan III Valverde III Savich III’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

24
cited by 24 later decisions
2
states following
February 2021
most recently cited

6 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently February 2021

6 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

1401990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp. · Houston v. Lack · Needler v. Valley National Bank of Arizona · Fallen v. United States · Borelli v. City of Reading

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “prison authorities are in a position to easily show when a document was received or mailed under established prison procedures for recording the date and time at which papers are received by prison officials in the prison's mail room.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “when a pro se prisoner deposits his notice of appeal with prison authorities, addressed to the clerk of court with postage prepaid, it is deemed filed at that moment for purposes of Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4(a).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[a] pro se prisoner seeking to appeal a bankruptcy court order faces precisely the same problems as a prisoner who wishes to file a pro se appeal from an order dismissing a habeas petition”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.