Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 999 F.2d 86 - Orsi

Orsi’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

97
cited by 97 later decisions
February 2017
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 26 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 97 later decisions — most recently February 2017 · most notably Carmona v. Toledo (2000), Cray Communications, Inc. v. Novatel Computer System, Inc. (1994)

3 federal appellate · 26 district ·

410199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Hal Roach Studios, Inc. v. Richard Feiner & Co. · Markowitz v. Northeast Land Co. · Hooks v. Hooks · Farina v. Mission Investment Trust · Martz v. Union Labor Life Insurance

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 97 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““[ujnsworn, unauthentieated documents cannot be considered on a motion for summary judgment. To be admissible at the summary judgment stage, documents must be authenticated by and attached to an affidavit that meets the requirements of Rule 56(e)-that the documents be admissible in evidence.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “It is well established that unsworn, unauthenticated documents cannot be considered on a motion for summary' judgment”); Planmatics, Inc. v. Showers, 137 F.Supp.2d 616, 620 (D.Md.2001) (”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Fed.R.Civ.P. 56 prescribes specific procedures to be followed in submitting evidence for or against a summary judgment motion. These procedures help assure the fair and prompt disposition of cases. They ensure further that neither side in a dispute can unfairly surprise the other with evidence that the other has not had time to consider. They also allow a district court to ascertain, through criteria designed to insure reliability and veracity, that a party has real proof of a claim before proceeding to trial.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.