999 F. Supp. 705 - Polite v. Button’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1367 · 28 U.S.C. § 1738 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio Corporation · Allen v. McCurry · Stanley v. Illinois · Migra v. Warren City School District Board of Education
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“jurisdiction to entertain plaintiff's motion for leave to file a late notice of claim,”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In Re Dayton“[s]uch applications must be made to the supreme or county court”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In Re Dayton
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.