999 F. Supp. 2d 269 - Page v. Mancuso’s Empirical Analysis
2013
Citation profile
5 district ·
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly · Ashcroft v. Iqbal · Monell v. Department of Social Services of City of New York · Harlow v. Fitzgerald
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“To clear this high hurdle, plaintiffs ordinarily couch 'custom or practice' liability on allegations of 'practices so persistent and widespread as to practically have the force of law.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“documents attached as exhibits or incorporated by reference in the complaint, or documents upon which the plaintiff's complaint necessarily relies[.]”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“concentrated, fully packed, precisely delineated scenarios as proof that an unconstitutional policy or custom exists.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.