999 F. Supp. 2d 35 - Porter v. Astrue’s Empirical Analysis
2013
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2412
Relies on Hensley v. Eckerhart · Commissioner, Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Jean · National Association of Concerned Veterans v. Secretary of Defense Green · Role Models America, Inc. v. Brownlee · In Re Raymond J Donovan
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“using a local or regional CPI avoids the pitfalls of using the national CPI: (1) Depriving an attorney of the actual increase in the CPI where he works when that increase (if measured locally or at least regionally) is greater than the increase in the national CPI; or (2) creating a windfall where the national CPI increase is greater than either the applicable local or regional CPI increase.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Jensen v. Berryhill“for certain matters, social security cases seem to be different. Some courts advocating for use of a local or regional CPI conclude that it is more fair to”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Jensen v. Berryhill“use the cost of living actually experienced by the applicant.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Jensen v. Berryhill
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.