Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 999 P2D 1289 - State v. Miniken

State v. Miniken’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
July 2015
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 116 Wash. 2d 342 - Rozner v. City of Bellevue · State v. Chester · State v. Chester · Clauson v. Dept. of Labor and Industries · 54 Wash. App. 489 - State v. Johnson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “As a part of any sentence, the court may impose and enforce an order that relates directly to the circumstances of the crime for which the offender has been convicted, prohibiting the offender from having any contact with other specified individuals or a specific class of individuals for a period not to exceed the maximum allowable sentence for the crime ....”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.