Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 999 P2D 448 - Simpson v. Walters

Simpson v. Walters’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
July 2007
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Chapsky v. Wood · Bishop v. Benear · Osburn v. Roberts · Application of Grover · Olinghouse v. Olinghouse

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “to disturb the trial court's decision. The trial court did not err in denying Mother's writ of habeas corpus in August of 1997 nor her motion to reconsider [new trial]. ¶ 14 In conclusion, this court would offer the parties herein the final observation made by the court in the Osburn case:”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. In Re NLW
  2. “In such cases three rights or interests are to be regarded: First, that of the parent; second, that of those who have for years discharged all the obligations of parents; and third, and chiefly, that of the child.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. In Re NLW
  3. “Id. at ¶ 10, 681 P.2d at 83 (citations omitted) (emphasis added). ¶ 6 In deciding the Grover case, the supreme court noted that the trial court left custody with the grandparents, because the trial court found”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. In Re NLW

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.