State v. Pope’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
22 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently January 2022
22 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 110 Wash. 2d 682 - State v. Scott · 105 Wash. 2d 1 - State v. Bergeron · 125 Wash. 2d 707 - State v. Byrd · 100 Wash. 2d 607 - State v. Johnson · State v. Smith
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A harmless error analysis is never applicable to the omission of an essential element of the crime in the `to convict' instruction. Reversal is required.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. DeRyke · State v. Jennings“(1) Any person having been released by court order or admitted to bail with the requirement of a subsequent personal appearance before any court of this state, and who knowingly fails to appear as required is guilty of bail jumping.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“one of the elements of bail jumping is that the defendant was held for, charged with, or convicted of a particular crime,”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. DeRyke · State v. Aguilar
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.