Debry v. Goates’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
9 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently April 2024
9 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Pennsylvania v. Ritchie · State v. Robertson · State v. Cardall · Scott v. Majors · 10 Kan. App. 2d 293 - State v. Pitchford
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“As to a communication relevant to an issue of the physical, mental, or emotional condition of the patient in any proceeding in which that condition is an element of any claim or defense, or, after the patient’s death, in any proceedings in which any party relies upon the condition as an element of the claim or defense[.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“'[elven if the communications may fall into [rule 506(d)(1)'s] exception to [the] privilege, the patient has the right to be notified of the potential disclosure of confidential records.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“assure[ ] that the patient can pursue the appropriate procedural safeguards in court to avoid unnecessary disclosure.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.