Odom v. Lee’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
1 district · 5 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 1 (§ 1 of the Sherman Antitrust Act)
Relies on Poller v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc. · Jefferson Parish Hospital District No. 2 v. Hyde · Federal Trade Commission v. Indiana Federation of Dentists · Business Electronics Corp. v. Sharp Electronics Corp. · Maple Flooring Mfrs' Ass'n v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[when an antitrust plaintiff has established a prima facie case, he should have an opportunity to prove the necessary supporting facts at trial.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“every contract, combination in the form of trust or otherwise, or conspiracy, in restraint of trade or commerce is unlawful.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[A] contract between a hospital and a group of anesthesiologists is not considered a per se violation of the Sherman Act.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.