Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 999 P2D 771 - Worthy v. State

Worthy v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
March 2013
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Coon · Hawley v. State · Covington v. State · Williams v. State · State v. Covington

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “As a general rule, contradictory evidence may not be admitted if it relates to a collateral matter. If a matter is considered collateral, the testimony of the witness on direct or cross-examination stands-the examiner must take the witness's answer. If the matter is not collateral, extrinsic evidence may be introduced disputing the witness's testimony on direct or cross-examination.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “[wle need not decide which [rule of admissibility] applies.... Because the state interjected the [possibly collateral issue] into the case and made its occurrence a central part of the case against Worthy, the issue became independently relevant.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  3. “No error in cither the admission or the exclusion of evidence ... is ground for granting a new trial or for setting aside a verdict ... unless refusal to take such action appears to the court inconsistent with substantial justice.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.