Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 999 S.W.2d 153 - Preble v. Young

Preble v. Young’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
May 2018
most recently cited

1 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently May 2018

1 district · 1 state decisions

10199920002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 113th Judicial District Court)

Relationships

Relies on Nixon v. Mr. Property Management Co. · Rogers v. Ricane Enterprises, Inc. · Hart v. Van Zandt · Anderson v. Snider · Hicks v. Humble Oil and Refining Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In an assault and battery case, if the defendant establishes the lack of physical contact, then he successfully eliminates an essential element of the cause of action.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.