Ex Parte Renfro’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
17 state decisions
Appellate journey
reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 180th Judicial District Court)
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Minnesota v. Murphy · Daughtry v. United States · Kellogg v. United States · Tennard v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Although the Appellant has a duty to answer the polygraph examiner's questions truthfully, unless he invokes the privilege, shows a realistic threat of self-incrimination and nevertheless is required to answer, no violation of his right against self-incrimination is suffered. The mere requirement of taking the test in itself is insufficient to constitute an infringement of the privilege.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. In re D.L.C. · In Re DLC“(1) whether Amended Conditions 18 and 19 have no relationship to the offense of sexual assault; (2) whether Amended Conditions 18 and 19 relate to conduct that is not in itself criminal; and (3) whether Amended Conditions 18 and 19 forbid or require conduct that is not reasonably related to appellant’s future criminality or do not serve the statutory ends of community supervision.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Ex Parte Alakayi“No person shall be ... compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. In Re DLC
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.