Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 999 S.W.2d 596 - Oliver v. State

Oliver v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
March 2014
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 351st Judicial District Court)

Relationships

Relies on Illinois v. Allen · Estelle v. Williams · Watts v. Indiana · United States v. Harris · Randle v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[I]f an accused asserts his right to not be placed before the jury while wearing clothing which bears the indicia of incarceration, thus invading his right to a presumption of innocence, it is the duty of the trial court, the accused’s attorney, the state’s attorney, and the peace officers in control of the accused to offer the accused an opportunity to wear civilian clothes.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[t]he presumption of innocence, although not articulated in the Constitution, is a basic component of a fair trial under our system of criminal justice”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “should not be ignorant as judges of what we know as men.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.