Circuit split · commercial law
Whether a security interest in inventory or receivables automatically extends to after-acquired inventory or receivables absent an after-acquired property clause
1 federal appellate case on this question, each acknowledging the disagreement in its own words.
Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals · December 14, 1998
“We acknowledged the existence of a split of authority on whether a security interest in inventory or receivables automatically extended to after-acquired inventory or receivables despite the absence of an after-acquired property clause, but, on the facts of the case, did not have to decide the issue.” — Split of authority
Empirical analysis of this case →
The other side of the split
Decisions the acknowledging court(s) named as the opposing or joined side, quoted in the acknowledging opinion's own words.
- On the other side · 3d Cir.In re Middle Atl. Stud Welding Co.503 F.2d 1133
- On the other side · Bankr.C.D.Ill.Covey v. First Nat'l Bank (In re Balcain Equip. Co.)80 B.R. 461
- On the other side · Bankr.W.D.Mich.In re Taylored Prods., Inc.5 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 286
- Discussed · 9th Cir.Stoumbos v. Kilimnik988 F.2d 949
Cases are grouped by the legal question they announce a split on, classified from the court's own acknowledgment sentence. Verified acknowledgments only. Counter-side decisions are extracted from the acknowledging opinions' own text and linked only when the citation resolves in this corpus. See all circuit splits.