Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

Circuit split · bankruptcy law

Whether provisions of the Bankruptcy Code governing the commencement of proceedings (e.g., the involuntary-petition requirements of 11 U.S.C. § 303) are grants of subject matter jurisdiction rather than non-jurisdictional prerequisites.

1 federal appellate case on this question, each acknowledging the disagreement in its own words.

  1. Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals · April 23, 2008

    “This Court acknowledged that we had not considered the question before, but that there was a split of authority elsewhere regarding whether these code provisions constitute grants of subject matter jurisdiction that leave a court without any authority to hear certain proceedings — i.” — Split of authority
    Empirical analysis of this case →

The provision at issue

11 U.S.C. § 303 — Involuntary cases
“(a) An involuntary case may be commenced only under chapter 7 or 11 of this title, and only against a person, except a farmer, family farmer, or a corporation that is not a moneyed, business, or commercial corporation, that may be a debtor under the chapter under which such case is commenced. (b) An involuntary case against a person is commenced by the filing with the bankruptcy court of a petition under chapter 7 or 11 of this title— (1) by three or more entities, each of which is either a holder of a claim against such person that is not …”
Read the full section →

The other side of the split

Decisions the acknowledging court(s) named as the opposing or joined side, quoted in the acknowledging opinion's own words.

  • Joined byPugh158 F.3d 530
    “constitute statutes of limitations that can be waived.” Section 546(a) provided, at the time the Pugh bankruptcy case began, that “[a]n action or proceeding under section 544, 545, 547, 548, or 553 of this title [governing the trustee’s authority to avoid certain pre-petition transactions involving the debtor’s assets] may not be commenced after the earlier of — (1) two years after the appointment of a trustee ...” — Trusted Net Media Holdings, LLC v. Morrison Agency, Inc., acknowledging the split
  • Discussed · 5th Cir.In re All Media Properties, Inc.646 F.2d 193
    “However, Trusted Net contends that we are not free to apply our own judgment to the interpretation of § 303(b) because this Court’s predecessor, in All Media, already decided the issue presents ed.” — Trusted Net Media Holdings, LLC v. Morrison Agency, Inc., acknowledging the split

What the split turns on

Cases are grouped by the legal question they announce a split on, classified from the court's own acknowledgment sentence. Verified acknowledgments only. Counter-side decisions are extracted from the acknowledging opinions' own text and linked only when the citation resolves in this corpus. See all circuit splits.