Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

Circuit split · employment law

Whether the FLSA exempts time spent by employees donning and doffing required protective or sanitary gear as non-compensable 'changing clothes' under § 203(o), or whether such activities are compensable principal activities

1 federal appellate case on this question, each acknowledging the disagreement in its own words.

  1. Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals · August 14, 2007

    “2d 188 (2002), and has generated a circuit split.” — Acknowledges a circuit split
    Empirical analysis of this case →

What the split turns on

Anchor precedents:
Ledbetter127 S.Ct. 2166 ·
Edelman v. Lynchburg College535 U.S. 106
Doctrines & tests:
manifestation of intent test

Cases are grouped by the legal question they announce a split on, classified from the court's own acknowledgment sentence. Verified acknowledgments only. See all circuit splits.