Circuit split · criminal procedure
Whether a court reviewing a habeas challenge to interstate extradition may look beyond the four factors of Michigan v. Doran to consider other defenses to extradition
1 federal appellate case on this question, each acknowledging the disagreement in its own words.
- Harden v. Pataki320 F3D 1285
Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals · February 10, 2003
“Furthermore, we disagree with the Seventh Circuit’s análysis — the only other circuit court to have addressed this issue in a published opinion.” — Disagrees with another circuit
Empirical analysis of this case →
The other side of the split
Decisions the acknowledging court(s) named as the opposing or joined side, quoted in the acknowledging opinion's own words.
- On the other side · 7th Cir.Knowlin v. Thompson207 F.3d 907
“Thompson, 207 F.3d 907 , 907, 908 (7th Cir.2000), a state prisoner filed a § 1983 damages action against Arkansas law enforcement officers for allegedly violating the UCEA by extraditing him to Wisconsin before a hearing could be held on his habeas petition.” — Harden v. Pataki, acknowledging the split
What the split turns on
- Anchor precedents:
- Heck
- Statutes:
- § 1983
Cases are grouped by the legal question they announce a split on, classified from the court's own acknowledgment sentence. Verified acknowledgments only. Counter-side decisions are extracted from the acknowledging opinions' own text and linked only when the citation resolves in this corpus. See all circuit splits.