Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

Circuit split · criminal procedure

Whether the Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination bars the prosecution from using a nontestifying defendant's post-arrest, pre-Miranda silence as substantive evidence of guilt

1 federal appellate case on this question, each acknowledging the disagreement in its own words.

  1. Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals · February 7, 2008

    “We also note that this court has not resolved, and there is a circuit split as to, whether the Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination prohibits prosecution proof, as substantive evidence of guilt, of a nontestifying defendant’s post-arrest, pre-Miranda warning silence not in response to custodial interrogation.” — Acknowledges a circuit split
    Empirical analysis of this case →

The other side of the split

Decisions the acknowledging court(s) named as the opposing or joined side, quoted in the acknowledging opinion's own words.

What the split turns on

Constitutional provisions:
Fifth Amendment

Cases are grouped by the legal question they announce a split on, classified from the court's own acknowledgment sentence. Verified acknowledgments only. Counter-side decisions are extracted from the acknowledging opinions' own text and linked only when the citation resolves in this corpus. See all circuit splits.