Circuit split · criminal procedure
Whether the Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination bars the prosecution from using a nontestifying defendant's post-arrest, pre-Miranda silence as substantive evidence of guilt
1 federal appellate case on this question, each acknowledging the disagreement in its own words.
- United States v. Martinez-Larraga517 F3D 258
Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals · February 7, 2008
“We also note that this court has not resolved, and there is a circuit split as to, whether the Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination prohibits prosecution proof, as substantive evidence of guilt, of a nontestifying defendant’s post-arrest, pre-Miranda warning silence not in response to custodial interrogation.” — Acknowledges a circuit split
Empirical analysis of this case →
The other side of the split
Decisions the acknowledging court(s) named as the opposing or joined side, quoted in the acknowledging opinion's own words.
- On the other side · 5th Cir.United States v. Salinas480 F.3d 750
- On the other side · 8th Cir.United States v. Frazier408 F.3d 1102
What the split turns on
- Constitutional provisions:
- Fifth Amendment
Cases are grouped by the legal question they announce a split on, classified from the court's own acknowledgment sentence. Verified acknowledgments only. Counter-side decisions are extracted from the acknowledging opinions' own text and linked only when the citation resolves in this corpus. See all circuit splits.