Circuit split · criminal law
Whether the statutory provision § 2(b)(2) requires proof of pecuniary gain as an element of the offense
1 federal appellate case on this question, each acknowledging the disagreement in its own words.
- United States v. Probel214 F3D 1285
Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals · June 13, 2000
“2(b)(2) requires pecuniary gain has created a split among the Circuits with the Seventh and Ninth Circuits holding that pecuniary gain, .” — Acknowledges a circuit split
Empirical analysis of this case →
The other side of the split
Decisions the acknowledging court(s) named as the opposing or joined side, quoted in the acknowledging opinion's own words.
- Discussed · 11th Cir.United States v. Garrett190 F.3d 1220
Cases are grouped by the legal question they announce a split on, classified from the court's own acknowledgment sentence. Verified acknowledgments only. Counter-side decisions are extracted from the acknowledging opinions' own text and linked only when the citation resolves in this corpus. See all circuit splits.