Whether the Seventh Amendment guarantees a right to a jury trial when no legal damages claim remains to be tried.

The other side of the split

Decisions the acknowledging court(s) named as the opposing or joined side, quoted in the acknowledging opinion's own words.

• On the other side · D.C. Cir.Filmon Process Corp. v. Sirica379 F.2d 449

  “Sirica, 379 F.2d 449 (D.C.Cir.1967), is dismissed by the panel in a footnote because the ease does not involve a declaratory judgment.” — In re Lockwood, acknowledging the split

• On the other side · 6th Cir.United Transp. Union, Local 74 v. Consolidated Rail Corp.881 F.2d 282
• On the other side · 4th Cir.Francis v. Dietrich682 F.2d 485

  “Dietrich, 682 F.2d 485 , 487 (4th Cir.1982) (‘Withdrawal of the claim for damages left only equitable issues.”); Hildebrand v.” — In re Lockwood, acknowledging the split

• On the other side · 6th Cir.Hildebrand v. Board of Trustees of Michigan State Univ.607 F.2d 705

  “Board of Trustees of Michigan State Univ., 607 F.2d 705 , 708 (6th Cir.1979) (“A key dividing line between law and equity has historically been that the former deals with money damages and the latter with injunctive relief.”); Skippy, Inc.” — In re Lockwood, acknowledging the split

• On the other side · 4th Cir.Skippy, Inc. v. CPC Int'l, Inc.674 F.2d 209

What the split turns on

Constitutional provisions:

Seventh Amendment