Circuit split · property law
Whether a temporary moratorium that deprives a landowner of all economically viable use of property constitutes a categorical (per se) regulatory taking requiring just compensation.
1 federal appellate case on this question, each acknowledging the disagreement in its own words.
Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals · October 20, 2000
“The panel opinion creates a conflict with Tabb Lakes, Ltd.” — Creates a split
Empirical analysis of this case →
The other side of the split
Decisions the acknowledging court(s) named as the opposing or joined side, quoted in the acknowledging opinion's own words.
- On the other side · Fed. Cir.Tabb Lakes, Ltd. v. United States10 F.3d 796
“The panel opinion creates a conflict with Tabb Lakes, Ltd.” — Tahoe-Sierra Preservation Council, Inc. v. Tahoe Regional Planning Agency, acknowledging the split
What the split turns on
- Anchor precedents:
- First English107 S.Ct. 2378 ·
- Lucas505 U.S. 1017
Cases are grouped by the legal question they announce a split on, classified from the court's own acknowledgment sentence. Verified acknowledgments only. Counter-side decisions are extracted from the acknowledging opinions' own text and linked only when the citation resolves in this corpus. See all circuit splits.