Dollars Obligated by this Agreement The value of this contract. A positive obligation amount means the agency has or will pay the Vendor this amount. A negative amount is a de-obligation, money that was paid back to the agency.:
$11,800.00
Base Contract and Exercised Options Value For new awards or Indefinite Delivery Vehicles, this is the contract value for the base contract and any options that have been exercised, if any, at the time of the award. For modifications, this is the change in the current contract value, positive or negative, that results from this modification.:
$11,800.00
Base Contract and All Options Value This is the mutually agreed upon total contract or order value including all options (if any). For Indefinite Delivery Vehicles, the estimated value for all orders expected to be placed against the agreement. For modifications, the change (positive or negative) in the mutually agreed upon total contract value.:
$11,800.00
Agency Categories
Contracting Office Agency
Offices
Office Type: Contracting Office
Office: Funded by Foreign Entity
Not Applicable
Date Signed The date that a mutually binding agreement was reached. The date signed by the Contracting Officer or the Vendor, whichever is later.:
08/01/2007
Effective Date The date that the parties agree will be the starting date for the contract's requirements. :
08/01/2007
Current Completion Date For an initial award, the scheduled contract completion date for the base contract and any options exercised at the time of the award. For modifications that exercise options, the revised scheduled completion date for the base contract and the exercised options.:
08/30/2007
Ultimate Completion Date The mutually agreed upon contract completion date for the entire contract or order including all options or other modifications. For a Delivery Order, this refers to the completion of that delivery only, not the completion date of the Indefinite Delivery Vehicle of the Delivery Order. :
08/30/2007
Contract Action Type
Purchase Order
Type Of Contract Pricing
J: Firm Fixed Price
Subcontract Plan
Not Applicable
Letter Contract
Not Applicable
Performance Based Service Contract
Y: Yes - Service Where Pba Is Used.
Contingency Humanitarian Peace Keeping Operation
Not Applicable
Cost or Pricing Data
Not Applicable
Cost Accounting Standards Clause
Not Applicable
Description of Contract Requirement A brief description of the goods or services bought (for an award) or that are available to be bought (for an Indefinite Delivery Vehicle). :
THE ATTRACTIVE COMBINATION OF LIGHT WEIGHT AND HIGH STIFFNESS OF AL-LI ALLOYS HAS MADE THEM IMPORTANT CANDIDATE MATERIALS FOR AEROSPACE APPLICATIONS. THESE ALUMINUM ALLOYS HOWEVER, ARE CONSIDERED DIFFICULT TO WELD BY CONVENTIONAL FUSION WELDING DUE TO THE DENTRITIC STRUCTURE TYPICAL OF A FUSION WELD. THE DENTRETIC STRUCTURE CAN SERIOUSLY WEAKEN AND DEGRADE THE WELDED JOINT MECHANICAL PROPERTIES DEEMING THE WELD INEFFECTIVE FOR STRUCTURAL APPLICATIONS. FRICTION STIR WELDING (FSW) WAS DEVELOPED RECENTLY AS A PROMISING SOLID STATE PROCESS WITH ENCOURAGING RESULTS. THIS WELDING TECHNIQUE HAS POTENTIAL SIGNIFICANT APPLICATION IN DIFFERENT INDUSTRIAL APPLICATIONS, AND HAS RESULTED IN WELDED JOINTS BEING USED IN CRITICAL LOAD BEARING STRUCTURES, AND STRUCTURALLY DEMANDING APPLICATIONS. THIS WELDING PROCESS TRANSFORMS THE METAL INTO A PLASTIC STATE AT A TEMPERATURE BELOW THE MELTING TEMPERATURE OF THE MATERIAL, AND THEN MECHANICALLY STIRS THE MATERIAL TOGETHER UNDER PRESSURE TO FORM A WELDED JOINT. THE FSW CONSISTS OF A WED NUGGET, A THERMO-MECHANICAL AFFECTED ZONE (TMAZ), AND A HEAT AFFECTED ZONE (HAZ). FSW TAKES PLACE AT TEMPERATURE BELOW THE MELTING TEMPERATURE; THEREFORE, RESIDUAL STRESSES MAY BE CONSIDERABLY LESS THAN THOSE IN FUSION WELDS. NEVERTHELESS, RESIDUAL STRESSES THAT DEVELOP DURING THE FSW PROCESS CAN REACH VALUES UP TO 75% OF THE YIELD STRESS. THESE RESIDUAL STRESSES CAN HAVE A SIGNIFICANT EFFECT ON THE SERVICE PERFORMANCE OF THE WELDED MATERIAL. RESIDUAL TENSION STRESSES IN THE WELD CAN ALSO RESULT IN STRESS CORROSION CRACKING (SCC). ALUMINUM ALLOYS MAY FAIL BY CRACKING ALONG GRAIN BOUNDARIES WHEN SIMULTANEOUSLY EXPOSED TO CERTAIN ENVIRONMENTS AND STRESSES OF SUFFICIENT MAGNITUDE. THE STRESSES CAPABLE OF CRACK INITIATION AND CRACK GROWTH CAN BE FAR BELOW THE STRESSES REQUIRED FOR YIELDING. INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE OF THE WELDMENTS CONTINUES TO BE EXTREMELY IMPORTANT FOR PROPER DETECTION AND REPAIR OF STRESS CORROSION CRACKS. HOWEVER, SOMETIMES IT MAY BE DIFFICULT TO INSPECT THE WELDS DUE TO ACCESS RESTRAINTS. THEREFORE, LASER SHOCK PEENING WAS INVESTIGATED AS A MEAN OF MODERATING THE TENSILE RESIDUAL WELDING STRESSES. LASER SHOCK PEENING IS A PROCESS IN WHICH A LASER BEAM IS PULSED UPON A METALLIC SURFACE, PRODUCING A PLANAR SHOCKWAVE THAT TRAVELS THROUGH THE WORKPIECE AND INTRODUCES COMPRESSIVE RESIDUAL STRESSES IN THE MATERIAL. LASER PEENING HAS BEEN PROVEN TO BE CAPABLE OF ENHANCING THE FATIGUE AND MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF A NUMBER OF METALLIC MATERIALS. THE LASER PEENING TECHNIQUE GENERATES A COMPRESSIVE RESIDUAL STRESS AT THE SURFACE THAT CAN BE SIGNIFICANTLY HIGHER AND DEEPER THAN FOR CONVENTIONAL SHOT PEENING. IN THIS STUDY, SHOT PEENING, AND A VARIETY OF LASER PEENING INTENSITIES WERE USED TO INTRODUCE COMPRESSIVE RESIDUAL STRESSES INTO FSW AA 2195. THE INFLUENCE OF THE DIFFERENT PEENING TECHNIQUES ON STRESS CORROSION CRACKING FOR FSW SPECIMENS WERE CHARACTERIZED AND ASSESSED BY SLOW STRAIN LOAD TESTING. THE BENEFITS FROM THE VARIOUS PEENING TECHNIQUES WERE ASSESSED AND DOCUMENTED.
Number of Actions Identifies the number of actions that are reported in one modification. Only the Department of Defense must report this information. For new contracts or modifications to contracts, agreements or orders, this is the number of actions that involved contract modifications for additional supplies or services.:
1
National Interest Action Code
Not Applicable
Multiple Or Single Award IDC
Not Applicable
Vendor Name
Vendor Alternate Name:
GEORGIA TECH
Vendor Legal Organization Name:
GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY
Division Name
Not Applicable
Vendor Address
ATLANTA, GA 30332-0002
United States Vendor State Congressional District
GA05
Vendor Site Code :
0033216190000PR
Vendor Alternate Site Code:
303320002
DUNS number
The Vendor's unique Data Universal Numbering System (DUNS) number issued by Dun & Bradstreet. :
003321619
Parent DUNS Number
The prime awardee parent organization's Data Universal Numbering System (DUNS) number issued by Dun & Bradstreet. :
180655748
Registration Date:
01/10/2002
Modification Parent
Location of Performance Location of the principal plant or place of business where the items will be produced, supplied from stock or where the service will be performed. :
4000
Address Place of Performance
Place of Performance Congressional District
GA05
Product Service Code Category
A: Research And Development
Product Or Service Code
AZ11: R&D-Other R & D-B Res
Principal NAICS Code
The principal North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code (used to designate major sectors of the economies of Mexico, Canada, and the United States) that indicates the industry in which the vendor does business. :
541710
GFE GFP
Transaction does not use Government Furnished Equipment or Property
Use Of Epa Designated Products
EPA-Designated Products Were Not Required
Recovered Material Clauses
C: No Clauses Included And No Sustainability Inclu
Country of Origin The country of origin of the product or service.:
USA
Procurement Instrument Identifier The unique identifier for each contract, agreement or order. This may be the Contract, Purchase Order, or Agreement Number for this award. :
Fiscal Year The fiscal year in which the award occurred. :
2007
Extent Competed
A: Full And Open Competition
Number of Offers Received The number of actual offers or bids were received in response to the solicitation for this award. :
7
Commercial Item Acquisition Procedures
D: Commercial Item Procedures Not Used
Solicitation Procedures
Sp1: Simplified Acquisition
Type Of Set Aside
None: No Set Aside Used.
Annual Revenue
The vendor's annual gross revenue, taken from an average of the last three years as obtained from System for Award Management (SAM).:
$1.00
Educational Institution:
Yes
State Government Organization:
Yes
Non-Profit Organization:
Yes
Contracting Officer Business Size Determination
O: Other Than Small Business
Inter Agency Contracting Authority
X: Not Applicable