Videlicet

To wit; that is to say; namely. This word has in general the same meaning as scilicet (q. v.), and is used in the same manner as that term; and the remarks under that word as to the force and construction of clauses introduced by scilicet apply in like manner to those following a videlicet. But a peculiar office of videlicet, in pleading, is to mark that the party does not undertake to prove the precise circumstances of time, quantity, value, &c., alleged under a videlicet strictly as alleged; and he is not held to such proof. The English terms proper to be used for this purpose, instead of videlicet, are "to wit," or "that is to say;" which should be inserted immediately preceding the allegation as to which certainty is not intended. This is termed laying the time, &c., under a videlicet, although English words be used. The words to wit, or, that 18 to say, so frequently used in pleading, are technically called the ridelicet or scilicet; and when any fact alleged in pleading is preceded by or accompanied with these words, such fact is, in the language of the law, said to be laid under a videlicet. The use of the videlicet or scilicet is to point out, particularize, or render more specific that which has been previously stated in general language only; also to explain that which is doubtful or obscure. It has been called by Lord ceding general statement, it may be rejected. But a videlicet or scilicet, which is not so contrary, and which is not mere surplusage, cannot be rejected as immaterial, but may be traversed like any other averment. (Dakin's Case, 2 Wms. Samd. 290.) Broim. Videlicet is used to avoid a variance and escape a positive averment which must be strictly proved.

Brown v. Berry, 47 III. 176.