Incompatible

— Offices are said to be "incompatible and inconsistent " when, 1 [People V. Supervisors of Niagara, 4 Hill, 23 (1842), Bronson, J. 2 Andrews v. Boyd. 5 Me. *203 (1828), Weston, J. Compare Scott v. 'West, 63 Wis. 532, 590 (1885). 3 Wilcox -v. County Commissioners, 103 Mass. 546 (1870), Ames, J. * Thompson's Appeal, 100 Pa. 481-82 (1882), Gordon, J.; Sim's Appeal, 44 id. 347 (1863). « Eley's Appeal, 103 Pa. 306 (18S3), Sterrett, J. ? United States v. Schillinger, 14 Blateh. 71 (1876); Gray v. Darlington, 15 Wall. 63 (1872). See also 14 La. An. 815; 9 Mass. 372; 8 Duer, 426; 30 Barb. 637; 4 Abb. N. C. 400; 1 Wil. (Ind.)219; 16F.R.14. from the multiplicity of business, they cannot be executed by the same person with care and ability;

— or, when their being subordinate and interfering with each other induces a presumption that they cannot both be executed with impartiality and honesty.' Incoinpatibility.

See Divorce.