Indictment

crim. law, practice, is a written accusation of one or more persons of a crime or misdemeanor, presented to, and preferred upon oath or affirmation, by a grand jury legally convoked.

4 Bl. Com. 299; Co. Litt. 126; 2 Hale, 152; Bac.-Ab. h. t.; Com. Dig. h. t. (A); 1 Chit. Cr. L. 168.

To render an indictment valid, there are certain essential and formal requisites.

— First, the essential requisites are, lst, that the indictment be presented to some court having jurisdiction of the offence stated therein; 2dly, that it appears to have been found by the grand jury of the proper county or district; 3dly, that the indictment be found a true bill, and signed by the foreman of the grand jury; 4thly, that it be framed with sufficient certainty;

— for this purpose, the charge must contain a certain description of the crime or misdemeanor, of which the defendant is accused, and a statement of the facts by which it is constituted, so as to identify the accusation.

Cowp. 682, 3; 2 Hale, 167; 1 Binn. R. 201; 3 Binn. R. 533; 1 P. A. Bro. R. 360; 6 Serg. & Rawle, 398; 4 Serg. & Rawle, 194; 4 BI.

Con: 301; 3 Yeates, R. 407; 4 Cranch, R. 167. dthly, The indictment must be in the English language. But if any document ina out in the original tongue, and then translated, showing its application.

6 T. R. 162.

Secondly, the formal requisites, are, Ist, the venue, which at common law should always be laid in the county where the offence has been committed, although the charge is in its nature transitory, as a battery.

Hawk. B. 2, c. 25, 8. 35.

The venue is stated in the margm thus, ‘“* City and county of Philadelphia, to wit.” 2dly, The presentment which must be in the present tense, and is usually expressed by the following formula, “the grand inquest of the commonwealth of Pennsylvania, inquiring for the city and county aforesaid, upon their oaths and affirmations present.” 3dly, The name and addition of the defendant; but in case an error has been made in this respect, it is cured by the plea of the defendant.

Bac. Ab. Misnomer, (B); Indictment, (G 2); 2 Hale, 175; 1 Chit. Pr. 202.

4thly, The names of third persons, when they must be necessarily mentioned in the indictment, should be stated with certainty to a common intent, so as: sufficiently to inform the defendant who are his accusers. When, however, the names of third persons cannot be ascertained, it is sufficient in some cases, to state “a certain person or persons to the jurors aforesaid unknown.”

Hawk. B. 2, c. 25, 8.71; 2 East, P.C. 651, 781; 2 Hale, 181; Plowd. 85; Dyer, 97, 286.

Sthly, The teme when the offence was committed, should in general be stated to be on a specific year and day. In some offences, as in perjury, the day must be precisely stated, 2 Wash. C. C. Rep. 328; but although it is necessaty that a day certain should be laid in the indictment, yet, in general, the prosecutor may give evtdence of an offence committed on any other day previous to the finding 316.

Vide 11 Serg. & Rawle, 177; 1 Chit. Cr. Law, 217,224; 1 Chit. Pl. Index, tit.

Time. 6thly, The offence should be properly described. This is done by stating the substantial circumstances necessary to show the nature of the crime; and, next, the formal allegations and terms of art required by law.

1.

As to the substantial circumstances. The whole of the facts of the case necessary to make it appear judicially to the court that the indictors have gone upon sufficient premises, should be set forth; but there should be no unnecessary matter or any thi which on its face makes the indictment repugnant, inconsistent, or abe surd.

2 Hale, 183; Hawk. B. 2, c. 25, 8s. 57; Bac. Ab. h. t. (G 1); Com. Dig. h. t.(G 3); 2 Leach, 660; 2 Str. 1226.

All indictments ought to eharge a man with a particular offence, and not with being an offender in general: to this rule there are some exceptions, namely, a common barrator, a common scold, and the keeper of a common bawdyhouse, may be indicted by these general words. 1 Chit. Cr. Law, 230, and the authorities there cited. The offence must not be stated ia the disjunctive, so as to leave it une certain on what it is intended to rely @S an accusation; as, that the defen. dant erected or caused to be erected a nuisance.

2 Str. 900; 1 Chit. Cr. Law, 236.—2.

There are certain terms of art used, so appropriated by the law to express the precise idea which it entertains of the offence, that no other terms, however synonymous they may seem, are capable of filling the same office: such, for example, as traitorously, (q. v.) in treason; feloniously, (q. v.) in felony; burglariously, (q. v.) in burglary; maim, (q. v-) in mayhem, &c. 7thly, The conclusion of the indictment should conform to the state on the subject, where there is such provision; as in Pennsylvania, Const. art.

5, s.

12, which provides, that “ all prosecutions shall be carried ‘on in the name and by the authority of the commonwealth of Pennsylvania, and conclude against the peace and dignity of the same.” As to the necessity and propriety of having several counts in an indictment, vide 1 Chit. Cr. Law, 248; as to joinder of several offences in the same indictment, vide 1 Chit. Cr. Law, 253; Arch. Cr. Pl. 60; several defendants may in some cases be joined in the same indictment, Ib. 255; Arch. Cr. P].

59.

When an indictment may be amended, sce Ib. 297; Stark. Cr. Pl. 286; or quashed, Ib. 299; Stark. Cr. Pl. 331; Arch. Cr. 66.

Vide, generally, Arch. Cr. Pl. B.1, part 1, c. 1, p. 1 to 68; Stark. Cr. Pl. 1 to 336; 1 Chit. Cr. Law, 168 to 304; Com. Dig. h.t.; Vin. Ab.h.t.; Bac. Ab. h.t.; Dane’s Ab. h.t.; Nels. Ab. h. t.; Burn’s Just. h.t.; Russ. on Cr. Index, h. t.

By the constitution of the United States, Amendm. art. 5, no person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a grand jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the militia, when in actual service in time of war, or ublic danger. -INDICTOR. He who causes another to be indicted. The latter is sometimes called the indictee. ©