Transhipment

The act of taking the gia v. Hardware Co., 124 Ga. 633, 53 S. E. cargo out of one ship and loading it in an- 193; an action on the case for rescue is loother. cal; Poor v. Doble, Quincy (Mass.) 86. Or- When this is done from necessity, it does dinarily actions relating to land are local; not affect the liability of an insurer on the Grace v. Cox, 16 Ipd. App. 150, 44 N. E. 813; goods; Abbott, Shipp. 240. But when the so of trespass for damages to land; Du master tranships goods without necessity, Breuil v. Pennsylvania Co., 130 Ind. 137, 29 he is answerable for the loss of them by cap- N. E. 909; and of an action for damages to ture by public enemies; Trott v. Wood, 1 a mill privilege caused by a dam in another Gall. 443, Fed. Cas. No. 14,190. county; Thompson v. Crocker, 9 Pick. (Mass.)