boycott

[t]o combine in refusing to hold relations' ") (citation omitted).

A conspiracy to injure the business of any person by inducing others to abstain from business relations with him. The methods are so diverse as not to be comprehended by any definition. For illustrations, see 84 Va. 927; 45 Fed. 135; 55 Conn. 79. If force or intimidation is resorted to, such combinations are unlawful. As to their legality in the absence of such measures, see 15 Q. B. Div. 476.

An organized effort to exothers by persuasion, intimidation and other acts which tend to violence, and thereby to coerce him, through fear of resulting injury, to submit to dictation in the management of his affairs. Casey v. Typographical Union, 45 Fed. 135, 12 L. R. A. 193, citing State v. Glidden, 55 Conn. 46, 8 Atl. 890, 3 Am. St. Rep. 23. In State v. Glidden, 55 Conn. 46, 8 Atl. 890, 3 Am. St. Rep. 23, it was held that to threaten or intimidate a person to compel him against his will to do or abstain from doing any act which he has a legal right to do, is an unlawful conspiracy. See also 15

A combination among persons to prevent dealings with another or others, such as employers or tradesmen, for the purpose of coercion. B. E. The initial letters of Bancus Regis, or Bancus RegincB, the name of the English Court of King's or Queen's Bench.