Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

bill of review

Definitions from Case Law · United States Supreme Court

Definitions from Case Law

From 290 U.S. 504 - First Nat. Bank of Cincinnati v. Flershem · 1934Most cited · 233 citing opinions

A bill of review is called for only after a final decree—one that finally adjudicates upon the entire merits, leaving nothing further to be done except the execution of it. For this reason, a bill of review will not lie to review an interlocutory order appointing a receiver.

How the Supreme Court has restated “bill of review”

1825184018601880190019201934 most cited: 290 U.S. 504 - First Nat. Bank of Cincinnati v. Flershem (1934)
first stateddeparted

Each Supreme Court definition of “bill of review,” sized by how often later courts cited it. “Change” is measured by wording overlap with earlier definitions — a rough signal, not a semantic judgment.

How often courts cite the cases defining “bill of review”

180018501900195020002030147

Court decisions citing the 4 opinions that defined “bill of review” — 590 in all, by decade. Counts are citations to the defining cases as a whole, not verified uses of the term. The dip in the most recent years is a data-coverage gap, not a real trend — our corpus holds fewer opinions from the latest years.

All 5 definitions, chronological · 1825–1934

  1. Courts of equity, acting upon the principle, that laches and neglect ought to be discountenanced, and that in cases of stale demands its aid ought not to be afforded, have always interposed some limitation to suits brought in those Courts... an account for rents and profits, in a common case, is not carried beyond six years, or a redemption of mortgaged premises allowed after twenty years possession by the mortgagee, or a bill of review entertained after twenty years, by analogy to the statute which limits writs of error to that period.

    twenty-year limitation by analogy

  2. It is, therefore, a compound bill of review, of supplement, and of revivor; and it is entirely maintainable as such, if it presents facts which go to the merits of the original decree of foreclosure and sale.

    and types

  3. the rule in each country is precisely the same, in legal effect... viz., that the bill of review must be founded on some error apparent upon the bill, answer, and other pleadings, and decree; and that you are not at liberty to go into the evidence at large in order to establish an objection to the decree, founded on the supposed mistake of the Court in its own deductions from the evidence.

    error of law

  4. The function of a bill of review filed for newly discovered evidence is to relieve a meritorious complainant from a clear miscarriage of justice where the court is able to see, upon a view of all the circumstances, that the remedy can be applied without mischief to the rights of innocent parties, and without unduly jeopardizing the stability of judicial decrees. The remedy is not a matter of absolute right, but of sound discretion.

    newly discovered evidence