Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

doctrine of relation

Definitions from Case Law · United States Supreme Court

Definitions from Case Law

From 80 U.S. 92 - Gibson v. Chouteau · 1871Most cited · 377 citing opinions

that principle by which an act done at one time is considered by a fiction of law to have been done at some antecedent period. It is usually applied where several proceedings are essential to complete a particular transaction, such as a conveyance or deed. The last proceeding which consummates the conveyance is held for certain purposes to take effect by relation as of the day when the first proceeding was had.

How the Supreme Court has restated “doctrine of relation”

184618601880190019201925 most cited: 80 U.S. 92 - Gibson v. Chouteau (1871)
first statedrestated (same sense)departed

Each Supreme Court definition of “doctrine of relation,” sized by how often later courts cited it. “Change” is measured by wording overlap with earlier definitions — a rough signal, not a semantic judgment.

How often courts cite the cases defining “doctrine of relation”

18401850190019502000202081

Court decisions citing the 5 opinions that defined “doctrine of relation” — 595 in all, by decade. Counts are citations to the defining cases as a whole, not verified uses of the term. The dip in the most recent years is a data-coverage gap, not a real trend — our corpus holds fewer opinions from the latest years.

All 5 definitions, chronological · 1846–1925

  1. The theory or fiction upon which this result is arrived at is, that the execution is taken in judgment of law to have been issued at the time it bears date, however the fact may have been, and that being prior to the death of the defendant, and the goods being bound from the teste, or presumed issuing, execution upon them is deemed to have commenced in the lifetime of the party, and being an entire thing, may be completed notwithstanding his death.

    executions after death

  2. 1861·66 U.S. 209 - Johnston v. Jones[p17]· cited 84×

    It is a legal fiction, invented to promote the ends of justice. It is a general rule, that it shall do no wrong to strangers. It is applied with vigor between the original parties, when justice so requires; but it is never allowed to defeat the collateral rights of third persons, lawfully acquired.

  3. 1869·76 U.S. 315 - Lynch v. Bernal[p18]· cited 37×

    That doctrine is applied only to subserve the ends of justice, and to protect parties deriving their interests from the claimant pending the proceedings for the confirmation of his title. It gives effect to the confirmation of the title as of the day when the proceedings to secure such confirmation were instituted; and for that purpose only can the decree be treated as made at that time.

  4. The doctrine of relation is a legal fiction invented to promote the ends of justice. It is never allowed to defeat the collateral rights of third persons, lawfully acquired