Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

Indictable cheat

Definitions from Case Law · United States Supreme Court

Definitions from Case Law

From 1 U.S. 335 - Respublica v. Teischer · 1788Most cited · 5 citing opinions

false weights, measures, or tokens

in such impositions or deceits where common prudence may guard persons against the suffering from them, the offence is not indictable, but the party is left to his civil remedy for the redress of the injury that has been done him; but where false weights and measures are used, or false tokens produced, or such methods taken to cheat and deceive, as people cannot by any ordinary care or prudence be guarded against, there it is an offence indictable.

How often courts cite the case defining “Indictable cheat”

178018001825185018751900192519302

Court decisions citing the opinion that defined “Indictable cheat” — 5 in all, by decade. Counts are citations to the defining case as a whole, not verified uses of the term. The dip in the most recent years is a data-coverage gap, not a real trend — our corpus holds fewer opinions from the latest years.